Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKonya, Petek
dc.contributor.authorDemirtürk, Neşe
dc.contributor.authorGürbüz, Melahat
dc.contributor.authorÇolak, Gamze
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-12T07:53:01Z
dc.date.available2023-10-12T07:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationKonya, P., Demirturk, N., Gürbüz, M., & Colak, G. (2023). Comparison of the Characteristics of Brucella Patients Diagnosed With Blood Culture Positivity and/or Serology. Cureus, 15(8).en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-8184
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43758.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/1633
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the clinical, laboratory, and treatment response characteristics of patients diagnosed with positive culture or serology. In this way, we wanted to assess the validity of serological diagnosis. Materials and methods: The study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional study between January 2010 and 2020. Patients with clinical and laboratory findings of acute/subacute brucellosis, patients with positive serological tests, and patients with growth of Brucella spp. in blood culture were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 - Wright agglutination test result ≥ 1/160 and Brucella spp. growth in blood culture; Group 2 - Wright agglutination test result ≥ 1/160 and no growth in blood culture; and Group 3 - Brucella spp. growth in blood culture and negative serological test. These three groups were retrospectively evaluated for clinical features, laboratory parameters, areas of involvement, treatment options, and treatment response. Results: We identified 294 patients diagnosed with brucellosis. Blood cultures were obtained from all patients, and Brucella spp. was detected in 40 patients (13.6%). There were 35 patients in Group 1, 254 patients in Group 2, and five patients in Group 3. When examining patients with symptoms, only fever showed a difference between the groups, which was significantly higher in Group 1. Laboratory investigations of the C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels of the patients showed significant differences between the groups; these parameters were significantly higher in Group 1. Conclusion: No significant difference was found in terms of treatment response and prognosis between patients with and without blood culture growth who were clinically compatible with acute/subacute brucellosis as diagnosed by serological methods. Therefore, serological tests are reliable methods for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cases where blood culture is inconclusive.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCA : Cureusen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7759/cureus.43758.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBlood Cultureen_US
dc.subjectBrucellosisen_US
dc.subjectInfectionen_US
dc.subjectRose Bengal Dyeen_US
dc.subjectSerologyen_US
dc.titleComparison of the characteristics of brucella patients diagnosed with blood culture positivity and/or serologyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5055-1220en_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKonya, Petek
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDemirtürk, Neşe
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGürbüz, Melahat
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇolak, Gamze
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.relation.journalCurēusen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster