Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoçak, Umut Ziya
dc.contributor.authorGüran, Ortaç
dc.contributor.authorKalkan, Serpil
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Erol
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Merve
dc.contributor.authorKaratosun, Vasfi
dc.contributor.authorÜnver, Bayram
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T11:53:31Z
dc.date.available2022-05-24T11:53:31Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationKocak, U. Z., Guran, O., Kalkan, S., Kaya, E., Kurt, M., Karatosun, V., & Unver, B. (2021). Assessing the knee flexion range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: Technology versus senses. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 28, 547-551.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-9283
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/1068
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Following total knee arthroplasty surgery, attention should be paid to post-operative knee range of motion to achieve daily activities. Goniometer assessment is widely used to assess the range of motion in the post-operative period. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater ability of a smartphone application and visual estimation of the knee joint after total knee arthroplasty among different professions that commonly work together and compare whether any method is superior to another. Method Range of motion measurements was performed by four clinicians as two physiotherapists and two orthopedic fellows. They utilized the Goniometer Reports application for smartphones, universal goniometer, and visual estimation to measure angles of knees which was operated. A two-way mixed model of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence level was used to assess inter-rater reliability. Results Thirteen patients (11 female) and 20 knees (10 right) were assessed. The ICCs were found excellent both for between methods and between raters. Conclusion Our results show that technology seems a more accurate way to determine the knee range of motion after knee arthroplasty compared to senses. However, in lack of technological resources or time, or to avoid possible infection, visual estimation also could provide useful information.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.011en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectRange of motionen_US
dc.subjectEstimationen_US
dc.subjectSmartphoneen_US
dc.titleAssessing the knee flexion range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: Technology versus sensesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8516-5653en_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKalkan, Serpil
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.startpage547en_US
dc.identifier.endpage551en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapiesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record