Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇilekar, Şule
dc.contributor.authorTülek, Baykal
dc.contributor.authorKanat, Fikret
dc.contributor.authorSüerdem, Mecit
dc.contributor.authorLevendoğlu, Funda
dc.contributor.authorTaşpınar, İbrahim Tuğrul
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-05T22:16:57Z
dc.date.available2021-05-05T22:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2148-3620
dc.identifier.issn2148-5402
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/ejop.ejop_16_19
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpNd01UQTVPUT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/493
dc.description.abstractOBJECTİVES: The effectiveness of low-intensity pulmonary rehabilitation program applied patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in terms of exercise capacity, dyspnea scale, life quality and respiratory muscle strength. METHODS: The study included 30 patients with COPD. The program was 3 days in a week, for a 6 weeks period between December 1st 2012 and August 31st 2013. Arterial blood gas (ABG), 6 minute walking test (SMWT), respiratory function tests and respiratory muscle strength were evaluated before and after treatment. St George's breathing questionnaire (SGRQ) was used to assess quality of life. The dyspnea scores were assessed by the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Patient approvals were obtained for the study. For analysis of results kolmogorov smirnov test, shapiro – wilk test, wilcoxon test and sample ttest were used. RESULTS: Of 30 patients participated in our study, 26 completed the treatment program. There were increases in SMWT distance (P = 0.049), forced expiratory volume in one second , and forced expiratory flow (FEF 25-75) value (P < 0.05); and decreases in mMRC dyspnea scale score (P = 0.001), CAT score (p=0.003) and SGRQ score (P <= 0.001). Maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure values and ABG parameters did not show significant change. CONCLUSION: Low intensity pulmonary rehabilitation therapy has positive effects on exercise capacity, dyspnea scale, walking distance, and quality of life. Patient compliance was high in this treatment modality so according to our study results, low intensity pulmonary rehabilitation treatment can be prefer to high intensity pulmonary rehabilitation treatment in COPD.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSolunum Sistemien_US
dc.titleEffect of low‑intensity pulmonary rehabilitation program on quality of life and pulmonary functions in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göğüs Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇilekar, Şule
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/ejop.ejop_16_19
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage14en_US
dc.identifier.endpage20en_US
dc.relation.journalEurasian Journal of Pulmonologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster