Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDeste, G.
dc.contributor.authorDurkan, R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-05T22:14:09Z
dc.date.available2021-05-05T22:14:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_471_19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/333
dc.descriptionWOS:000526948300002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 32246650en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: The purpose of this study was to observe the stresses of all-on-four implant designs in an edentulous mandible in the implant, surrounding bone, and monolithic ceramics. Materials and Methods: In mandibular all-on-four implant models, anterior implants were placed vertically, and posterior implants were differently inclined. On the full-arch fixed prosthetic restoration monolithic zirconia framework, monolithic lithium disilicate was prepared as the superstructure. Model 1M (1M-15.5); posterior implants angled at 15 degrees to the occlusion plane and a cantilever length of 5 mm, Model 2M; (2M-15.9), Model 3M; (3M-30.5), and Model 4M; (4M-30.9) were prepared. A total of 300 N bilateral force was applied at an angle of 30 degrees and oblique to the occlusion plane. Stress values on dental implants, abutments, the surrounding bone, and prosthetic restorations were calculated. Results: The highest stress concentration was observed in the 2nd connector region between the canine and the 1st premolar tooth in the monolithic zirconia frameworks (457.21 MPa). Stress concentration in the cortical bone was 60.93 MPa in posterior implants. Stress was higher in posterior angled implants than straight implants. Stress at posterior angulation increased by 21 MPa in implants angled at 15 degrees. Conclusion: In bilateral loading, the force applied to anterior implants does not have a significant effect on the bone structure. Stress concentration increases in posterior angled implants and surrounding bone. Moreover, stress concentration increases as the length of the cantilever, the weakest part in all-on-four implants, increases. As posterior implant angulation increases, stress concentration level and localization are affected.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAfyon Kocatepe University Commission of Scientific Research ProjectsAfyon Kocatepe Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAfyon Kocatepe University Commission of Scientific Research Projects.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCeramicsen_US
dc.subjectdental implantsen_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.titleEffects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDeste, G.
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDurkan, R.
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_471_19
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage456en_US
dc.identifier.endpage463en_US
dc.relation.journalNigerian Journal Of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster