Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBaylan, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorEren, Berkay
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-28T16:54:00Z
dc.date.available2025-12-28T16:54:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2757-7163
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/GJU.2024.18189
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1236982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/3270
dc.description.abstractObjective: Radical cystoprostatectomy is the most important treatment option in local control and standard surgical treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and also has serious complications that occur during the postoperative period. We have aimed to evaluate postoperative bowel complications with peritoneal closure-assisted ileal conduit extraperitonealization technique. Materials and Methods: The data of 98 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion with the diagnosis of non-metastatic bladder cancer between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively screened. The groups of patients who underwent extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit with radical cystectomy and traditional radical cystectomy were evaluated comparatively in terms of perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications. Results: Forty-five patients who underwent cystectomy with ileal conduit extraperitonealization technique and 53 patients who underwent ileal loop diversion with traditional cystectomy were evaluated comparatively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics and duration of surgery. In the group that underwent cystectomy with extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit technique, the return of the normal gas pattern and the dwell time of the nasocracymic tube were statistically significantly shorter than the group that did not (p=0.017, p=0.023). The average length of hospital stay was 7.2 days in the extra-peritonealization group and 14.1 days in the group that did not undergo extraperitonealization, and this period was significantly shorter in the extraperitonealized group (p=0.013). There were no complications requiring reoperation in the extraperitonealized group. Conclusion: In radical cystectomy and ileal loop cutaneous urinary diversion, extraperitonizing the ileal segment reduces postoperative intestinal complications.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofGrand journal of urology (Online)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel
dc.subjectKadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
dc.subjectTıbbi Etik
dc.subjectTransplantasyon
dc.subjectOnkoloji
dc.subjectBladder cancer
dc.subjectcystectomy
dc.subjectileal loop
dc.subjectextraperitonealization
dc.titleCan Extraperitonealization of Ileal Conduit Protect from Postoperative Bowel Complications in Patients Who Have Undergone Radical Cystectomy with the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer?
dc.typeArticle
dc.departmentAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Üroloji Anabilim Dalı, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye,Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Üroloji Anabilim Dalı, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/GJU.2024.18189
dc.identifier.volume4
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage35
dc.identifier.endpage39
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.department-tempAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
dc.identifier.trdizinid1236982
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.snmzKA_TR-Dizin_20251227


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster