Comparison of the microhardness of lowviscosity bulk-fill composite resins

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the microhardness of five different low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. The bulk-fill composites used in the study; Estelite Bulk-fill flow (EBF), Filtek Bulk-fill (FBF), SureFil SDR flow (SDR), Tetric EvoFlow Bulk fill (TEFBF), X-tra Base (XBF). Cylindrical molds with a diameter of 5 mm and a height of 4 mm were used for the Vicker's Micro Hardness (VMH) test. Bulk-fill composite resins were placed in these molds at once. The polymerization of the composites was achieved for 20 seconds with the LED light curing. A total of 50 composite discs were prepared (n=10). Then the microhardness of the top and bottom surfaces was measured using MVK-H1 Microhardness Tester (Akashi Co, Tokyo, Japan. Depth of polymerization of each sample was recorded. Data were analyzed by using the Kruskal Wallis H and Mann Whitney-U tests. The bottom and top surface hardness values of the XBF composite samples (43.82±0.95 MPa, 47.87±0.59 MPa) were statistically significantly higher than the other bulk-fill composite samples (p<0.001). The bottom and top surface hardness values of the FBF composite (27.85±0.56 MPa, 22.05±1.40 MPa) were found to be statistically lower than other bulk-fill composite samples (p<0.001). Among the low-viscosity bulk-fill composites used in the study, except for FBF, the VMH values of the others were found to be above 0.80, and it was observed that they reached sufficient microhardness.