Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOzata, Merve Yeniceri
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Sadullah
dc.contributor.authorYolcu, Elif Nur
dc.contributor.authorOkumus, Tugba Baz
dc.contributor.authorFalakaloglu, Seda
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-28T16:40:41Z
dc.date.available2025-12-28T16:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1971-1425
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2023.37.01.05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/2677
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of phytic acid (IP6), ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and glycolic acid (GA) used as a final irrigation solution on the push -out bond strength (POBS) of a bioceramic-based root canal sealer.Methodology: The study included 60 single-root human mandibular premolars. After the teeth were decoronated, they were cleaned and shaped using the #25.08 Reciproc R25 single file system. Throughout preparation, each canal was irrigated using 20 ml 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). The teeth were divided into 4 group, each consisting of 15 (n=15) according to the final irrigation agent [1% IP6, 10% CI, 17% EDTA, and distilled water (DW)]. The final irrigation protocol consisted of application of 5 ml chelating agent for 1 minute followed by 5 ml 5.25% NaOCl application. Root canals were filled using Well Root ST canal sealer and Reciproc R25 gutta-percha, based on the single-cone technique. A 2-mm section was extracted from the middle part of the roots to test for POBS. Values were recorded in MPa and fracture types were examined. Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA (Welch's) test.Results: The GA, EDTA, and IP6 groups showed no significant intergroup differences (p>0.05). EDTA and GA groups had significantly higher POBS than the DW group (p<0.05). No signif-icant difference was observed between IP6 and DW groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: GA increased the bond strength of the bioceramic-based canal sealer to the root canal dentin at least as much as EDTA; IP6 exhibited similar strength to these chelators, it was not better than DW.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAriesdue Srl
dc.relation.ispartofGiornale Italiano Di Endodonzia
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectPhytic acid
dc.subjectglycolic acid
dc.subjectEDTA
dc.subjectpush-out bond strength
dc.subjectWell Root ST
dc.titleEffect of smear layer removal using different chelators on push-out bond strength of bioceramic sealer
dc.typeArticle
dc.departmentAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
dc.identifier.doi10.32067/GIE.2023.37.01.05
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage46
dc.identifier.endpage53
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.department-temp[Ozata, Merve Yeniceri; Kaya, Sadullah; Yolcu, Elif Nur; Okumus, Tugba Baz] Dicle Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Diyarbakir, Turkiye; [Falakaloglu, Seda] Afyonkarahisar Hlth Sci Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Afyonkarahisar, Turkiye
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164907024
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001019629000005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20251227


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster