Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAkinoglu, Bihter
dc.contributor.authorArikan, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBenguboz, Fatma Busra
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-28T16:40:36Z
dc.date.available2025-12-28T16:40:36Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn2651-4451
dc.identifier.issn2651-446X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1545160
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1342945
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/2643
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Evidence-based practice (EBP) isa method based on high-quality clinical research and practice. According to the World Confederation for Physical Therapy, EBP training should be at the forefront of physiotherapy practice recommendations. The aim of our study is to investigate the place of EBP and the barrier to it in the field of physiotherapy and rehabilitation in T & uuml;rkiye from the perspective of students, academicians and clinicians. Methods: The study was planned as a pilot study. The study was carried out with all students, academicians and clinicians in the field of physiotherapy and rehabilitation that could be reached during the study. In the evaluation, the EBP Scale consisting of 28 questions and a form prepared by the researchers questioning the opinions, knowledge level and obstacles to EBP were used. The study data were collected by creating a web-based form. Results: Our study was conducted with a total of 97 people, 44 students, 22 academicians and 31 clinicians. In the responses to the factors that prevent EBP, Obtaining an order (doctor's instructions for treatment) was stated as the first obstacle by 51.06%of students, 31.57%of academicians and 33.33% of clinicians. When the total EBP scale scores were compared between the three groups, statistically significant differences were found (p=0.000). Conclusion: When the results of our study were examined, it was seen that the knowledge and attitudes of physiotherapists in different fields regarding EBP varied, but in common, the main factor that made EBP difficult for students, clinicians and academicians in the field of physiotherapy and rehabilitation in T & uuml;rkiye was the taking orders factor.
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherTurkey Assoc Physiotherapists
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Physiotherapy Rehabilitation-Turk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectClinicians
dc.subjectEvidence-based practice
dc.subjectPhysical therapy
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.titleTHE ROLE OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN THE FIELD OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION IN TÜRKİYE FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF STUDENTS, ACADEMICIANS, AND CLINICIANS: A PILOT STUDY
dc.title.alternativeTÜRKİYE’DE FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON ALANINDA, ÖĞRENCİ, AKADEMİSYEN VE KLİNİSYEN BAKIŞ AÇISIYLA KANITA DAYALI UYGULAMANIN YERİ: PİLOT ÇALIŞMA
dc.typeArticle
dc.departmentAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
dc.identifier.doi10.21653/tjpr.1545160
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage194
dc.identifier.endpage202
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.department-temp[Akinoglu, Bihter] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Saglik Bilimleri Fak, Fizyoterapi & Rehabil Anabilim Dali, Ankara, Turkiye; [Arikan, Zeynep] Afyonkarahisar Saglik Bilimleri Univ, Saglik Bilimleri Fak, Fizyoterapi & Rehabil Anabilim Dali, Afyonkarahisar, Turkiye; [Benguboz, Fatma Busra] Atilim Univ, Saglik Hizmetleri Meslek Yuksekokulu, Terapi & Rehabil Bolumu, Ankara, Turkiye
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105017729252
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.trdizinid1342945
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001579170700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20251227


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster