Evaluation of the knowledge of general dentists, pediatric dentists, and orthodontists in Turkey regarding the diagnosis and orthodontic management timing of traumatized teeth
Özet
Objectives This study aimed to assess the knowledge levels of general dentists, pediatric dentists, and orthodontists in Turkey regarding the diagnosis and the timing of orthodontic management of traumatized teeth, based on the 2020 guideline of the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) and the orthodontic trauma guidelines published in 2008 and 2021. Methods A digital survey consisting of 23 multiple-choice questions was created on the Google Forms platform, based on the dental trauma and orthodontic trauma guidelines.The survey was distributed electronically via WhatsApp or email to orthodontists (n = 56), pediatric dentists (n = 66), and general dentists (n = 134). The data obtained were analyzed comparatively using Chi-Square tests (P < 0.05). Results The accuracy rate for the first six questions, focusing on the diagnosis of dental trauma, was high across all professional groups (ranging from 81.3% to 100%). However, the performance significantly decreased and varied in the subsequent questions (Q7-Q19), which assessed the timing of orthodontic force application. While no statistically significant difference was observed in overall performance among the groups, orthodontists showed significantly higher accuracy in questions related to orthodontic management timing (Q10-Regarding force timing after uncomplicated fractures, Q13-Regarding force timing after mild lateral luxation, Q17-Regarding force timing after root canal treatment, and Q19-Regarding force timing after autotransplantation reflecting their specialized training. Additionally, clinical experience was found to positively influence the rate of correct responses in some areas. Conclusion The study found that Turkish orthodontists, pediatric dentists, and general dentists have limited knowledge of the orthodontic management of traumatized teeth. It emphasizes the need for additional training and a national guideline to improve clinical practice.
















