Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorKara, Dilara
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Taha Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorEraslan, Leyla
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Ozgun
dc.contributor.authorSevinc, Ceyda
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-28T16:40:12Z
dc.date.available2025-12-28T16:40:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0031-9023
dc.identifier.issn1538-6724
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad066
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/2450
dc.description.abstractObjective. There is no consensus about the optimal frequency of patient visits during the rehabilitation program after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term effects of high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) visits of the patients in the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation after ARCR.Methods. This was a quasi-randomized study with 2 parallel groups. Forty-seven patients with ARCR were included in 2 different patient visit frequency protocols (HF = 23, LF = 24) in 12 weeks of postoperative rehabilitation. Patients in the HF group visited the clinic twice a week, whereas patients in the LF group visited once every 2 weeks for the first 6 weeks and once a week for the following 6 weeks. Both groups performed the same exercise protocol. Outcome measurements were pain and range of motion measured at baseline; at the 3rd, 5th, 8th, 12th, and 24th weeks; and at 1-year follow-up. Shoulder function was assessed at the 12th and 24th weeks and at 1-year follow-up with an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score.Results. There was a significant group x time interaction in pain intensity during the activity between the groups. The activity pain intensity was higher in the LF group (4.2 points) at 8 weeks post surgery than in the HF group (2.7 points) (mean difference: 1.5 points, P < .05), whereas it was similar in both groups at other time periods. The interaction term was not significant between the groups for pain intensity during rest and night through the 1-year follow-up. No group x time interactions were observed in shoulder range of motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score over the postoperative period.Conclusion. Both rehabilitation programs at different visit frequencies after ARCR showed similar clinical results in the long term. A supervised, controlled rehabilitation program with LF visits in the first 12 weeks after surgery can be sufficient to achieve optimal clinical results and reduce rehabilitation-related costs after ARCR.Impact. This study highlights that LF treatment protocols under the supervision of the therapist can be adopted after the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to achieve successful results while decreasing the treatment costs. Physical therapists should plan the treatment sessions efficiently for the compliance of the patients to the exercise treatment.Lay Summary. If you are a patient with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, a supervised, controlled rehabilitation program with low-frequency visits in the first 12 weeks after surgery could help you achieve the best outcome and help lower the costs of rehabilitation. A total of 3 visits in the first 6 weeks might be sufficient (once every 2 weeks). More frequent visits (1-2 visits a week) should happen 6 to 12 weeks after the surgery.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press Inc
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical Therapy
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCost-Effectiveness
dc.subjectPatient-Reported Outcomes
dc.subjectPostoperative Pain
dc.subjectPostoperative Rehabilitation
dc.subjectRotator Cuff Repair
dc.subjectSupervised Therapy
dc.titleEffects of Different Frequencies of Physical Therapy Visits on Shoulder Function After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0697-4290
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2006-9617
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1136-8284
dc.departmentAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ptj/pzad066
dc.identifier.volume103
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.department-temp[Demirci, Serdar] Balıkesir Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Balikesir, Turkiye; [Kara, Dilara; Eraslan, Leyla; Uysal, Ozgun; Sevinc, Ceyda; Turgut, Elif; Duzgun, Irem] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil Sports, Ankara, Turkiye; [Yildiz, Taha Ibrahim] Afyonkarahisar Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Afyonkarahisar, Turkiye; [Ulusoy, Burak] Cankiri Karatekin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Cankiri, Turkiye; [Gazeloglu, Ali Okan; Huri, Gazi; Turhan, Egemen] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Ankara, Turkiye
dc.identifier.pmid37341580
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174641855
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001080886300003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20251227


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record