Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkpinar, Meryem
dc.contributor.authorSalmanpour, Farhad
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-28T16:39:58Z
dc.date.available2025-12-28T16:39:58Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/2281
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer version 4.0 (ChatGPT-4.0) in determining cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist maturation stages using cephalometric and hand-wrist radiographic films. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 238 subjects who had cephalometric and hand-wrist radiographs taken on the same day. Each hand-wrist maturation stage was independently evaluated by 3 orthodontists using the method described by Bjork and Helm, whereas cervical vertebrae maturation stages were assessed following the methodology proposed by Bacetti and coworkers. These evaluations served as the reference standard for measuring the performance of ChatGPT-4.0. The hand-wrist and cephalometric radiographs were analyzed by ChatGPT-4.0, and the results were recorded by the primary researcher. Results: The model achieved its highest performance in the hand-wrist maturation stages during the RU stage, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.89. However, despite high precision values in the PP3U and MP3U stages, the model exhibited low recall values, indicating that certain positive instances were missed. In other stages, particularly DP3U and MP3CAP, low precision and recall values limited classification accuracy. Regarding cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVS), the model performed best in CVS1 (AUC, 0.82; precision, 0.806), with relatively favorable AUC values observed in CVS2 (AUC, 0.77). However, its predictive performance in CVS3 and CVS6 stages was suboptimal (AUC <0.67). Conclusions: ChatGPT-4.0 demonstrated accurate predictions in the RU and CVS1 stages. However, its overall performance was found to be inferior to that of other artificial intelligence models.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectGrowth
dc.titleChat Generative Pretrained Transformer-4.0's accuracy in assessing cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist maturation stages: A retrospective study
dc.typeArticle
dc.departmentAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.010
dc.identifier.volume168
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.department-temp[Akpinar, Meryem; Salmanpour, Farhad] Afyonkarahisar Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Orthodont, Ismet Inonu Cd 4, TR-03030 Afyonkarahisar, Merkez, Turkiye
dc.identifier.pmid41026070
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018009270
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001631590300016
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20251227


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record