Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGercek, Osman
dc.contributor.authorTopal, Kutay
dc.contributor.authorYazar, Veli Mert
dc.contributor.authorDemirbas, Arif
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-28T16:39:56Z
dc.date.available2025-12-28T16:39:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623
dc.identifier.issn1573-2584
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04052-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/2240
dc.description.abstractPurpose In our study, considering the clinical parameters we aimed to determine the most appropriate treatment approach for symptomatic gestational hydronephrosis and conditions requiring DJS insertion. Methods Our study was a retrospective cross-sectional study and 137 patients were included. The patients were divided into two groups: those with conservative follow-up and those with DJS. Demographic and clinical data, the degree of HUN detected in urinary ultrasonography and the anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis were evaluated. Factors affecting the need for DJS between groups were investigated. Also, it was aimed to determine the cut-off value for the HUN degree and renal pelvis AP diameter in patients with DJS. Results The presence of urinary system stones was statistically significantly higher in the group with DJS than in the group without DJS (p = 0.014). HUN degrees and AP diameter were statistically significantly higher in the DJS group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). HUN degree and renal pelvis AP diameter were the two most important predictors for DJS insertion (p = 0.005, p = 0.015, respectively). The AP diameter cut-off value for DJS installation was determined as 20.5 mm. Conclusion Although there are conservative and surgical treatment options for symptomatic hydronephrosis of pregnancy, the factors at the decision point between these options are still a matter of debate. In our study, we concluded that the most important determinants at this decision point are the HUN degree and renal pelvis AP diameter. We think that the cut-off values we have determined for these markers will guide clinicians in deciding on treatment.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urology And Nephrology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectHydronephrosis
dc.subjectUreteral catheterization
dc.subjectKidney stones
dc.titleFactors affecting the need for ureteral catheterization in symptomatic pregnancy hydronephrosis
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7885-1401
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8067-8601
dc.departmentAfyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11255-024-04052-2
dc.identifier.volume56
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage2819
dc.identifier.endpage2824
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.department-temp[Gercek, Osman; Yazar, Veli Mert] Afyonkarahisar Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Urol, Afyonkarahisar, Turkiye; [Topal, Kutay] Afyonkarahisar State Hosp, Dept Urol, Afyonkarahisar, Turkiye; [Demirbas, Arif] Istanbul Atlas Univ, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
dc.identifier.pmid38619779
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190387849
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001204739500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20251227


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record