Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Ayşin Tuba
dc.contributor.authorÖskan Yalçın, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorOral, Ayşe Yeşim
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T08:01:26Z
dc.date.available2023-04-17T08:01:26Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationPrimary versus secondary intraocular lens implantation following removal of congenital/de al of congenital/developmental catar elopmental cataracts: outcomes after acts: outcomes after at least 4 yearsen_US
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5560.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/1461
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of primary and secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation following removal of congenital/developmental cataracts. Methods: One hundred and forty-four patients aged under 16 years who were followed up between 2003 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The long-term results of children who underwent surgery before 2 years of age for congenital or developmental cataracts and underwent secondary IOL implantation after 2 years of age and those who underwent cataract surgery with primary IOL implantation after 2 years of age were compared. Patients with traumatic, secondary cataracts and cataracts due to ocular anomalies were not included in the study. Results: We evaluated 64 patients (mean age 9.5 ± 4.5 years) with secondary IOL implantation and 80 patients (mean age 12.8 ± 4.1 years) with primary IOL implantation in the study. Distance and near best-corrected visual acuities were significantly better in the primary IOL group than the secondary IOL group (p < 0.001). Incidence of strabismus after primary IOL surgery was significantly lower and presence of binocular vision was more often than the secondary IOL group (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of refraction and myopic shift (p = 0.242, p = 0.172, respectively). Mean refractive changes were significant in unilateral cases of secondary IOL group and primary IOL group (p = 0.013, p = 0.049, respectively) and myopic shift was also greater in both groups of unilateral cases than the fellow eyes (p = 0.023, p = 0.012, respectively). Discussion: Visual outcomes and binocular vision were better, and the incidence of strabismus was also much less in the primary IOL group.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherScientific and Technical Research Council of Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.55730/1300-0144.5560.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBinocular Visionen_US
dc.subjectIOL Implantationen_US
dc.subjectMyopic Shiften_US
dc.subjectStrabismusen_US
dc.subjectVisual Acuityen_US
dc.titlePrimary versus secondary intraocular lens implantation following removal of congenital/de al of congenital/developmental catar elopmental cataracts: outcomes after acts: outcomes after at least 4 yearsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorOral, Ayşe Yeşim
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.startpage77en_US
dc.identifier.endpage87en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster