Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorFalakaloğlu, Seda
dc.contributor.authorGündoğar, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-01T08:51:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-01T08:51:20Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationFalakaloğlu, S., & Gündoğar, M. (2022). Evaluation of the push out of bond strength of different bioceramic root canal sealers with different obturation techniques. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1971-1425
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.02.54
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/1409
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aims to evaluate the effect of different obturation techniques [single cone (SC) and warm vertical compaction (WVC)] on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of gutta-percha (GP) with three calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs). Methodology: Sixty single‑rooted mandibular premolars were selected and decoronated to obtain a standardized root length of 16 mm. The canals were instrumented using VDW.Rotate system and were assigned into six equal Groups based upon the CSBS and obturation technique used following; Group 1 and Group 2; BC Sealer HiFlow (HiFlow; Brasseler USA) with SC and WVC, Group 3 and Group 4; CeraSeal (Meta Biomed Co., Cheongju, Korea) with SC and WVC, Group 5 and Group 6; BioRoot RCS (Septodont, Saint‑Maur‑des‑Fosses Cedex, France) with SC and WVC. Roots were sectioned transversally at the thickness of 1±0.1 mm in thickness at 5 and 10 mm from the apex. The specimens were subjected to PBS test using a universal test machine at a loading speed of 0.5 mm/ min examined for their failure modes. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and multiple comparison tests. Results: BioRoot-WVC Group was a significantly lower PBS value than other Groups at 5 and 10 mm from the apex (p<0.05). At 5 and 10 mm from the apex, no significant difference in PBS was found among the BC Sealer HiFlow and CeraSeal sealers obturated using two different techniques (P>0.05). The most common failure mode found in all Groups was a mixed failure. Conclusions: WVC significantly reduced the PBS of the BioRoot RCS sealer compared to SC technique, but this was not significant with the BC Sealer HiFlow and CeraSeal.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPAGEPress Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.32067/GIE.2021.35.02.54en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBioRoot RCSen_US
dc.subjectCalcium silicate-base sealeren_US
dc.subjectCeraSealen_US
dc.subjectEndoSequence BC sealer Hiflowen_US
dc.subjectPush-out bond strenghen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the push out of bond strength of different bioceramic root canal sealers with different obturation techniquesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5230-969Xen_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorFalakaloğlu, Seda
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage151en_US
dc.identifier.endpage157en_US
dc.relation.journalGiornale Italiano di Endodonziaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster