Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKonya, Petek
dc.contributor.authorDemirtürk, Neşe
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T06:51:19Z
dc.date.available2022-07-08T06:51:19Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationKonya, P., & Demirtürk, N. (2022). Evaluation of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Treatment in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B. Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, 4(1), 47-55.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2667-646X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2022.78
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/1363
dc.description.abstractObjective: The main purpose of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is to improve the patients’ life quality and prevent the disease from progressing to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Continuous suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues is the most critical way to achieve this goal. This study aimed to evaluate the CHB patients retrospectively followed up with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment. Materials and Methods: The study was planned as retrospective research by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology between January 2001 and December 2020. We evaluated all treatmentnaive and treatment-experienced patients who received TDF (245 mg/day) treatment with the diagnosis of CHB. The data were obtained by reviewing the file information registered in the hospital automation system. HBsAg, Anti-HBs, HBeAg, Anti-HBe, HBV DNA, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values of the patients were evaluated at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months, and 6-month follow-ups throughout the treatment. Virological (HBV-DNA of < 50 IU/ml), biochemical (decrease below 40 IU/Ml in patients with pre-treatment value of ALT >40 IU/ml) and serological (Anti-HBe seroconversion in HBeAg positives and HBsAg negative and anti-HBs seroconversion in all patients) responses were examined. Adverse effects were also assessed during the treatment. Results: Data from 131 patients who received TDF treatment were evaluated. Virological responses were determined as 78.6%, 81.3%, 94.2%, and 100% in the patients at 24th week, 48th week, 4th year, and 8th year, respectively. While there was no Anti-HBs seroconversion in any patients in four years of the treatment, it was observed at a rate of 10.5% in the eighth year. We did not determine any significant adverse effects requiring discontinuation of the treatment in the long-term follow-up of 131 patients under TDF treatment. Conclusion: As a result of our study, TDF was an effective and well-tolerated choice for CHB treatment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDOC TASARIM VE BİLİŞİM YAYINCILIKen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.36519/idcm.2022.78en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTenofovir disoproxil fumarateen_US
dc.subjectHepatitis b infectionen_US
dc.subjectLiveren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Treatment in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis Ben_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5055-1220en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6186-2494en_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKonya, Petek
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDemirtürk, Neşe
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage47en_US
dc.identifier.endpage54en_US
dc.relation.journalInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster