Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorHafızoglu, Merve
dc.contributor.authorKoroglu, Reyhan
dc.contributor.authorDemır, Hacer
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorHafızoglu, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T07:48:42Z
dc.date.available2022-05-06T07:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citation%0 Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine The correlation of tumor markers, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and FDG PET/CT measures in pancreatic cancer %A Merve Hafızoğlu , Reyhan Koroglu , Hacer Demir , Erhan Bozkurt , Emre Hafızoğlu %T The correlation of tumor markers, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and FDG PET/CT measures in pancreatic cancer %D 2021 %J Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine %P -2687-4245 %V 3 %N 3 %R doi: 10.46310/tjim.839545 %U 10.46310/tjim.839545en_US
dc.identifier.issn2687-4245
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.839545
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/908
dc.description.abstractObjective:This review will outline the correlation of tumor markers and NLR (Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) with measures such as MTV (mean total volume), TLG (total lesion glycolysis), and SUV (standart uptake value) in 18F FDG PET/CT in pancreatic carcinoma with the goal of selection of appropriate treatment modality and decrease rates of treatment failure and recurrences in pancreatic carcinoma by using tumor markers. In this way, we can predict the results of imaging modalities, using easy lab technics such as NLR and tm markers. Methods:45 patients that new diagnosed pancreatic cancer were included in the study. Diagnosis were confirmed by cytology. Their tumor marker levels (CA 19.9, CEA and AFP), NLR and PET/CT measurements (SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG, MTV) were obtained. Patients that already diagnosed, followed up or treated by oncology department, were excluded. Results:When tumor markers were compared with PET/CT measurements (SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG, MTV and tumor size) there were no significant difference between them. Also, total uptake values of organs (liver, spleen, pancreas) were not related with tm marker levels. However, there were positive significant correlation between tumor size and SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG (p=0.02 r = 0.347, p=0.022 r = 0.340, p=0.008 r =0.392). Conclusions:Tumor markers may help diagnosing or managing of pancreatic malignities, but we cannot predict PET/CT results according to tumor marker levels. So, tumor markers must be used as an adjunctive method for diagnosing malignities. They cannot be major determiner for malignities. Diagnosing and following up malignities should be supported by other laboratory technics and imaging methods.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNizameddin KOCAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.46310/tjim.839545en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCA 19.9en_US
dc.subjectCEAen_US
dc.subjectAFPen_US
dc.subjectSUVMAXen_US
dc.subjectMTVen_US
dc.titleThe Correlation of Tumor Markers, Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio and FDG PET/CT Measures in Pancreatic Canceren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5401-223Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-3344-915Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1235-9363en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1853-7098en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6291-851Xen_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, İç Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorHafızoglu, Merve
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKoroglu, Reyhan
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDemır, Hacer
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBozkurt, Erhan
dc.contributor.institutionauthorHafızoglu, Emre
dc.identifier.volume3en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage95en_US
dc.identifier.endpage101en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Internal Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster