Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCamcı, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T12:38:17Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T12:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citation%0 Cumhuriyet Dental Journal RELATIONSHIP OF FOREHEAD AESTHETICS WITH FRONTAL SINUS SIZE AND SKELETAL MALOCCLUSIONS %A Hasan Camcı %T RELATIONSHIP OF FOREHEAD AESTHETICS WITH FRONTAL SINUS SIZE AND SKELETAL MALOCCLUSIONS %D 2020 %J Cumhuriyet Dental Journal %P 1302-5805-2146-2852 %V 23 %N 4 %R doi: 10.7126/cumudj.777128 %U 10.7126/cumudj.777128en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.777128
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/859
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Forehead inclination and aesthetics have received very limited attention, although forehead is critically important in obtaining total facial aesthetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between frontal sinus fields, forehead morphology, and skeletal malocclusion. Materials and Methods A total of 224 extraoral lateral photographs and cephalometric radiographs from skeletal class I, class II and class III patients in the post-pubertal period were investigated. Extraoral photographs and cephalometric radiographs were superimposed for each patient before measurements. The photographs were evaluated in three groups: Group A: Skeletal Class I malocclusions (n = 85), Group B: Skeletal Class II malocclusions (n = 74), Group C: Skeletal Class III malocclusions (n = 65). All subjects from the three groups were classified according to the types of the foreheads, and then on the photographs, four different angle measurements (A1, A2, A3, A4) were performed. In addition, the frontal sinus (FS) fields were calculated using the RadiAnt Dicom Viewer (Beta version) on cephalometric and posterior-anterior radiographs. One-way ANOVA, Chi-square, and Student t tests were used for statistical evaluation. Results No significant relationships between the skeletal malocclusions and the forehead types were seen. In Group C, the FS fields and A2 angles were higher than in the other groups. No gender-related variations were detected for any measurements. Conclusion There was a limited correlation between malocclusions, frontal sinus, and forehead morphology. Gender was not an element that creates morphological differences in forehead aesthetics.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7126/cumudj.777128en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectForehead aestheticsen_US
dc.subjectfrontal sinusen_US
dc.subjectskeletal malocclusionsen_US
dc.titleRelationship of forehead aesthetics with frontal sinus size and skeletal malocclusionsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0824-4192en_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorCamcı, Hasan
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage273en_US
dc.identifier.endpage282en_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster