Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDumanlı, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorMetin, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorGünay, Ersin
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-05T22:11:50Z
dc.date.available2021-05-05T22:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0256-4947
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2020.469
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/168
dc.descriptionPubMed: 33307740en_US
dc.description2-s2.0-85097631783en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) by either the endobronchial valve (EBV) or coil (EBC) procedure is recommended for severe emphysematous patients. BLVR applications generally help healthy lung areas ventilate more comfortably by reducing the hyperinflation and improving the contraction capacity of diaphragm. Objectives: Compare our experience with valve and coil BLVR devices. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Single tertiary care centre. Patients and Methods: Demographic data, vital signs, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), the six-minute walking test (6MWT), vital signs, arterial blood gases and complications were recorded. Main Outcome Measures: Change in PFTs and completion of the 6MWT. Sample Size: 60 Turkish men with a diagnosis of chronic pulmonary lung disease. Results: Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar in patients who underwent EBV and EBC. Thirty (96.8%) EBV patients and 27 (93.1%) of the EBC patients were able to properly complete the PFT before the procedures, but all complied after the procedures. Significant improvement in PFTs were achieved after the procedure and there were no statistically significant differences in post-procedure performance. For the 6MWT, the completion rate improved from 15 (48.4%) to 19 (61.3%) patients in the EBV patients (P=.125) and from 19 (65.5%) to 21 (72.4%) patients in the EBC patients (P=.500). There was no significant difference in completion rates for the walking test for either group (median 32 meters in EBV patients and 37 meters in EBC patients; P=.652). Vital signs and arterial blood gases were similar in the two groups. The rates of complications were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Endobronchial valves and coils are safe and effective methods for BLVR for patients with severe emphysema. Limitations: Relatively small sample, retrospective design, singlecentre retrospective study. Copyright © 2020, Annals of Saudi Medicine, Saudi Arabia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centreen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEndobronchial valve vs coil for lung volume reduction in emphysema: Results from a tertiary care centre in Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göğüs Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDumanlı, Ahmet
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGünay, Ersin
dc.identifier.doi10.5144/0256-4947.2020.469
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage469en_US
dc.identifier.endpage476en_US
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Saudi Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster