dc.contributor.author | Deveci Taç, Meltem | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaya, Sadullah | |
dc.contributor.author | Falakaloğlu, Seda | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-23T07:35:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-23T07:35:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Taç, M. D., Kaya, S., & Falakaloğlu, S. (2018). Evaluation of dentinal micro-cracks caused by the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next and Reciproc rotary file systems used in root canal preparation. International Dental Research, 8(3), 111-116. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2146-1767 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/1229 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: In this study, we compared the occurrence of dentinal micro-cracksafter use of the ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues,Switzerland), ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer), and Reciproc (VDW,Munich, Germany) nickel–titanium rotary file systems in root canalpreparation.Methodology: One hundred mandibular anterior teeth were divided intofive groups of 20 specimens each. Group 1 served as a control, with nointervention. In group 2, preparation was performed using the step-backtechnique and K files. In groups 3–5, root canal preparation was performedusing the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and Reciproc file systems,respectively. Following preparation, specimens were sectioned at 3, 6, and9 mm using a Minitom precision cut-off machine. The sections wereevaluated under a stereomicroscope. The following scoring system wasused to rate specimens: 1, no micro-crack; 2, incomplete micro-crack; and3, vertical root fracture. The results were statistically assessed (p≤0.05).Results: No micro-crack formation was observed in groups 1 and 2. Thehighest rate of micro-crack formation was observed in specimens preparedwith the ProTaper Universal file system (20%), followed by those preparedwith the Reciproc (11.7%) and ProTaper Next (6.7%) file systems. However,no significant difference was detected among groups (p>0.05). In thegroups ProTaper Universal and Reciproc files were used, 1 vertical rootfracture was found in 9 mm sections for each.Conclusions: Considering the limitations of in vitro studies, we canconclude that all rotary file systems used in this study led to dentinalmicro-crack formation in roots. The ProTaper Universal file system causedmore dentinal micro-cracking than did the ProTaper Next and Reciproc filesystems. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Dicle University | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no3.3 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Micro-crack | en_US |
dc.subject | ProTaper Universal | en_US |
dc.subject | Reciproc | en_US |
dc.subject | ProTaper Next | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of dentinal micro-cracks caused by the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next and Reciproc rotary file systems used in root canal preparation | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-5230-969X | en_US |
dc.department | AFSÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü | en_US |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Falakaloğlu, Seda | |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 116 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | International Dental Research | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |