Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGüneş, Nedim
dc.contributor.authorGül, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorDündar, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Samet
dc.contributor.authorBozoğlan, Alihan
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Erhan Cahit
dc.contributor.authorKarasu, Necmettin
dc.contributor.authorToy, Vesile Elif
dc.contributor.authorBingül, Muhammet Bahattin
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-26T09:44:30Z
dc.date.available2022-05-26T09:44:30Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationGunes, N., Gul, M., Dundar, S., Tekin, S., Bozoglan, A., Ozcan, E. C., ... & Bingül, M. B. (2021). Biomechanical evaluation of implant osseointegration after guided bone regeneration with different bone grafts. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(4), 1545-1548.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007102
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12933/1090
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical osseointegration of titanium implants after guided bone regeneration (GBR) with a hydroxyapatite graft, deproteinized bovine bone graft, human-derived allograft, and calcium sulfate bone graft. Thirty-two female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into four groups, each containing eight (n = 8) rats: hydroxyapatide (HA), deproteinized bovine bone graft (DPBB), allograft (ALG), and calcium sulfate. Bone defects were created in the tibia of the rats, which were grafted with HA, DPBB, ALG, or CP bone grafts for the purpose of GBR. Ninety days after surgery, machine-surfaced titanium implants were inserted into the area where GBR had been undertaken. After 90 days of the surgical insertion of the implants, the rats were sacrificed, the implants with surrounding bone tissue were removed, and biomechanical osseointegration (N/cm) analysis was performed. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups in osseointegration (N/cm) three months after the GBR procedures (P > 0.05). According to the biomechanical results, none of the grafts used in this study was distinctly superior to any of the others.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SCS.0000000000007102en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicen_US
dc.subjectBone graftsen_US
dc.subjectBone implant connectionen_US
dc.subjectGuided bone regenerationen_US
dc.subjectOsseointegrationen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical Evaluation of Implant Osseointegration After Guided Bone Regeneration With Different Bone Graftsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0388-5767en_US
dc.departmentAFSÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Plastik Rekonstrüktif ve Estetik Cerrahien_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKarasu, Necmettin
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1545en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1548en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster